probably, so far as I know, there is no professor of Hebrew or Old Testament at any world-class university who does not believe that the writer(s) of Genesis 1–11 intended to convey to their readers the ideas that: …
the figures contained in the Genesis genealogies provided by simple addition a chronology from the beginning of the world up to later stages in the biblical story." To arrive at the month and approximate date, Ussher concluded that Creation must have occurred during the Autumnal Equinox, which in fact is the favorite start of many of the world's calendars, ancient and modern.
Using biblical genealogies from Genesis 5 and 11, and other supporting Biblical passages, he pieced together a timeline for Biblical events. How did took a known point in Biblical history, namely, the fall of Jerusalem in 588 B. Counting back from there, with the Bible’s genealogies and the known number of years that these people lived, he simply added up the dates to get back to the 4,004 B. This is because his dates, if you choose to believe them, confirm the year of Adam’s creation.
Many Bibles have this timeline in the margins, indicating the estimated year that the events on that page occurred. Adam’s creation was the last event of God’s creation, the crowning achievement of God’s creation, at the end of Day Six.
Ussher's scheme is not accurate because these lists are not generational, but regnal, and the reigns of some kings coincided. Let us examine the problems with Ussher's scheme error by error.
He thus calculated the date of Creation at October 23, 4004 BC according to the Julian calendar.They calculate the earth's age at 6000 years on the basis of ages assigned to these rulers.Ussher failed to recognize that the so-called "genealogies" are King Lists.The only thing to ignore is the six literal days he adds, which we know were not 24-hour days.Many old-earth creationists, including the most prominent one today, Dr.